Why would lose if DiCaprio won an Oscar?
No wonder this attention. DiCaprio months a representative of his generation approx. Film tally includes a large number of works which received world-admired, was nominated for an Academy Award as best film. In addition to the fact that his dealings with the elite directors Hollywood Currently: Baz Luhrmann - James Cameron - Danny Boyle - Steven Spielberg - Woody Allen - Ridley Scott - Clint Eastwood - Christopher Nolan - Quentin Tarantino - Sam Mendes - Edward Zwick - Alejandro Anarret .. More importantly, Martin Scorsese, who deal with him until now 5 times.
If we add to the above the fact that his candidacy for the award previously 4 times in the representation, the beginning of his nomination as best supporting actor for the film What's Eating Gilbert Grape (1993) presented before he knew the fame, all the way to the latest failures to win Best Actor for The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 ) actually becomes a proven track record in front of us is worthy of recognition.
Winning the award has its disadvantages. According to estimates from the last 10 years has actor winner immediately, on average, an increase in pay between (3.5 million dollars), in addition to literary glory and fame the most performances in the roles. And of course to ensure victory for the film itself the highest sales, both at the box office or media viewing home sales.
All regular accounts - and any another star - seems to win if the gain. But DiCaprio is not like others. In my opinion it will not help him win as much as Sadharh!
A star nets heavy weight now, DiCaprio does not need to boost the Oscar about his wages. This completely drops the first feature. And certainly it has a cash balance of mass and universally applauded enough. As for the commercial for the movie itself won gains, it is certainly a source of happiness for producers more than others.
DiCaprio is currently without an Oscar in the best position! .. The continuing loss of the award, the best propaganda regular and sustained in his reputation as an actor, the more powerful and fuel for the support and sympathy of millions with him.
On the contrary, the former star Aandem luck for decades in the Oscars, led by Al Pacino, who won in the nineties after the shine and nominations over 20 years, luck DiCaprio willing to exist in a different time. The best time. Time online and Alsocheal Media. Time ordinary people merger flags and their contribution to it. Time comics and satirical images of GIF. Time to ensure any issue or a joke, a chance to turn to Trend media is spreading among the millions or billions.
The rules of this age and this world, not looking for an achievement or victory, as far as looking for a problem or dilemma. Winning will not be obtained in Alsocheal Media only a few days or weeks of celebration. The loss?! .. There is nothing wrong happened. Thousands of comics .. thousand jokes .. thousands of videos. DiCaprio (oppressed) is much better and more widespread, from DiCaprio (the winner)!
Certificate of loss and ensure the continued renewal of DiCaprio's dilemma with the Oscars. The dilemma means more and more attention to public and follow-up, waiting for the solution in other years and seasons to come .. wait mean follow-up stronger and ticket sales most probably next to his films .. mean follow-up stronger for a moment announced the list of nominations .. follow-up to the top of the ceremony Oscar is coming .. loss short of fuel DiCaprio makes it the most successful and most famous and more mass!
Winning the decisive point. Just like the final whistle in matches. Certainly a happy ending for him and his fans (myself included). But the final whistle simply means that follow-up is over! .. That DiCaprio has become like the rest. Another star holds an Oscar. It is time that Nhzvh name from the list of jokes Alsocheal Media, because the axis of humor over.
For these reasons, I do not see the expected win - and certainly from my point of view - I have a gain Caprio much as it is a temporary joy, pull to the most important point of the recipe has been associated with during his career (the star that Nashgah and respect him and did not garner appreciation after Alooscara).
Winning will be linked to the film is different from the mainstream. Unlike many see the movie The Revenant privileged to the fullest extent (we'll discuss this in detail in a review of the film later). I see DiCaprio's performance also block more than excellent already. But the nature of the role, which does not depend on dialogue, as far as relying on physical presence and eye looks, will not leave often the same stock left by other roles with millions of viewers, and on top of the two roles is best in its history, after the arrival of the famous (Aviator - The Wolf of Wall Street).
With the exception of Michael Fassbender's performance in the film "Steve Jobs" Steve Jobs do not see in other candidates who is better than DiCaprio. If winning just because of the different opinions. Comparison with previous roles also the idea of a mistake, because the prize at the end, belong to competitions in one year. There is no logic in the question: how to win this year and lost in The Wolf of Wall Street who made the role better? .. Regardless of the conviction that his role in the latter was already better.
And, of course, it can not be completely dismissed the idea of the effect (accrual) as the decisive factor in the vote Oscars in all branches. In losing the final in 2013 was my bet with a friend, that DiCaprio will win the prize at the Oscars in 2018 at the most. Why? .. Simply because it arrived after the recent loss of the pyramid (Merit). Thus all that is needed is often the last nomination, to reap the award.
The example that deserves to be mentioned here, it may be his teacher Martin Scorsese. Director and producer and scriptwriter who knew the way to Oscar nominations in 1980 with the film Raging Bull continued a regular participant in, finally winning in 2007 thanks to the film The Departed.
In the beginning with the announcement of the winner was the media and the monetary tone globally, is the graciousness beating, which is long overdue. Later after the end of the ceremony and its impact, it has become the dominant say (Scorsese deserves the award for other films). Is Scorsese benefited from the win? .. Do you stop the history of an exceptional director like him really an Oscar? .. Not my answer. Scorsese actually won his place much earlier. And that was probably an answer that does not match his mind.
Often we got to the station about DiCaprio in 2016. I see him winning by at least 99%, and I expect to have this win later questioned similar marks. In addition of course, the above-mentioned points. If you prefer to place (loss) quite happily! .. DiCaprio's first star I know, the more weight in the media and a mass of (continuing loss)!
At another level is also the first star was waiting for his moment of declaration of winners, happily confirmed in both cases! .. Or without Oscar, DiCaprio classify as one of the best representatives of his generation. Given the excellent choices constantly, it will almost always be held in this classification.
-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
(Visit our website here (cleopatra7a.blogspot.com) Htlaqy every need us)
----------------------------------
------------------------------------------
Cleopatra source
No comments:
Post a Comment